Donald Trump and E Jean Carroll in court as defamation trial resumes – live | Donald Trump

[ad_1]

Trump and Carroll arrive at Manhattan courthouse

Donald Trump’s motorcade has arrived at the federal courthouse in Manhattan.

a group of black cars driving in the rain
Vehicle carrying Donald Trump drives outside Manhattan federal court. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters
two black cars, one with red and blue flashing lights
Vehicle carrying Donald Trump drives outside Manhattan federal court. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters

E Jean Carroll has also been pictured arriving at the courthouse.

a woman with a blue coat, black sunglasses and an umbrella
E Jean Carroll walks outside Manhattan federal court. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters
a woman with a blue coat and navy blue umbrella
E Jean Carroll walks outside Manhattan federal court in New York City. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters

Updated at 

Key events

The court is now on lunch break.

It is set to resume at 10 minutes to 2pm.

Carol Martin testified that she had been friends with E Jean Carroll for more than 30 years, and that she had testified twice for the New York writer before.

Trump’s lawyer Alina Habba asked Martin whether she felt Carroll had enjoyed the attention that came with her lawsuits against Trump. “At points,” Martin responded.

Asked if she was “loving the adulation” she was receiving at one point, Martin said: “Yes.”

Martin: After the NYT podcast there was interest.. There was a Harvey Weinstein sidebar… Not just E. Jean, but others as well.
Habba: Did you think Ms. Carroll was enjoying the attention?
Martin: At points.
Habba: Ms. Martin, what does narcissism mean to you?

— Inner City Press (@innercitypress) January 25, 2024

Martin also testified that she regretted earlier text messages in which she said Carroll’s “narcissism had run amok”.

Updated at 

Meanwhile, the former Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro has been sentenced to four months in prison for defying a congressional subpoena issued by the January 6 committee.

Navarro was found guilty in September of two misdemeanor counts of criminal contempt of Congress. He served as a White House trade adviser under then president Donald Trump and later promoted the Republican’s baseless claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 election he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Navarro was the second Trump aide to face contempt of Congress charges, after former White House adviser Steve Bannon.

Former Trump White House official Peter Navarro arrives at the US federal courthouse in Washington. Photograph: José Luis Magaña/AP

Updated at 

Victoria Bekiempis

Victoria Bekiempis

As one might expect, Trump’s lawyer Alina Habba is trying to use Carol Martin to undermine Carroll’s credibility. She asked about their time at America’s Talking.

Do you know whether Ms Carroll was reprimanded at work for inappropriate work directed at Mr Ailes?

Carroll’s team objected and Judge Kaplan sustained their objection.

Updated at 

Victoria Bekiempis

Victoria Bekiempis

Carol Martin, is retired news anchor whom Carroll told about the alleged rape. Carroll told Martin about the incident several days after the alleged attack.

Carroll and Martin both worked at America’s Talking, a now-shuttered television network started by Roger Ailes. After they both finished work one day, Carroll had asked if they could hang out, Martin testified in Carroll’s first trial.

Martin previously told jurors they were in her kitchen when Carroll “started telling me what had just happened”.

Martin recounted how Carroll told her about the alleged incident. “What, if anything, did you say to Ms Carroll about what she should do in the future?” Martin was asked at the first trial.

“She explained that she thought she was doing the right thing by not doing anything,” Martin had said.

But she wasn’t asking me what I would do, and so at some point, I just volunteered that I didn’t think she should do anything because he was Donald Trump, and he had a lot of attorneys, and I thought he would bury her, is what I told her.

“I have questioned myself more times than not over the years as to why I told her that,” Martin said in the first trial.

I am not proud that that’s what I had told her.

Updated at 

Victoria Bekiempis

Victoria Bekiempis

With Carroll’s camp officially resting, Trump’s team is beginning the defense case.

Habba said:

Defense calls Carol Martin to the stand, please.

If Trump actually testifies, as he claimed he would, he would do so after Martin’s testimony ends.

Defense to call Carol Martin to the stand

Victoria Bekiempis

Victoria Bekiempis

Trump’s lead attorney, Alina Habba, said that the defense’s first witness will be Carol Martin.

Martin is a friend of Carroll’s and a former anchor at WCBS-TV in New York, who has publicly corroborated the writer’s allegations of sexual assault by Donald Trump.

During the first defamation trial against Trump last May, Martin said Carroll visited her within two days of Trump’s alleged attack. She described Carroll as “clearly agitated, anxious”.

Martin said she advised Carroll to keep quiet about the alleged assault. She said:

I just volunteered that she shouldn’t do anything because it was Donald Trump and he had a lot of attorneys and he would just bury her.

An artist’s depiction of E Jean Carroll watching as Carol Martin testifies in court about the aftermath of an alleged rape by Donald Trump, 4 May 2023. Photograph: Jane Rosenberg/Reuters

Martin said she “kept the covenant” not to talk about what Carroll had told her for many years until the advice columnist went public with her accusations against Trump in 2019.

Asked what she made of Carroll’s claim that Trump attacked her, Martin said:

I believed it then and I believe it today.

Updated at 

Victoria Bekiempis

Victoria Bekiempis

The plaintiff rests.

Donald Trump’s lawyers are up next.

Victoria Bekiempis

Victoria Bekiempis

We’re now on a short break.

Carroll’s team said they’re about to rest.

They said that Donald Trump’s team expects to call two witnesses, and he’s one of them.

Can Trump’s courtroom antics be contained?

Cameron Joseph

It’s not like the judges in his cases haven’t tried to curtail Donald Trump’s court theatrics. But they are in a bind: treating Trump like any other defendant and enforcing order in their courtrooms plays into his claims of political persecution.

The judge in the New York business fraud case, Arthur Engoron, ordered Trump to pay a $110,000 fine back in 2022 for dragging his feet in responding to a subpoena from the New York state attorney general. (He paid, but appealed the ruling; the money is being held in escrow until a final ruling is made.)

Judge Arthur Engoron, the judge in Trump’s business fraud case at a Manhattan courthouse, in New York City. Photograph: Shannon Stapleton/Reuters

Last October, Engoron placed a gag order on Trump barring him from attacking court staff, fined him $5,000 for violating it when Trump publicly disparaged a court staffer, and warned him that a future violation could result in jail time. Trump ignored the warning and did it again; Engoron responded with a $10,000 fine and a warning of, “Don’t do it again, or it will be worse” – but no jail time. The Trump team’s response was to put out a statement calling Engoron a “Democrat Judge, under control of radical [New York Democratic attorney general] Letitia James”.

In Trump’s pending January 6 case in DC, the judge, Tanya Chutkan, placed a gag order on Trump last fall barring him from attacking prosecutors, court staff and potential trial witnesses after he posted inflammatory statements that called special counsel Jack Smith “deranged” and suggested his former chief of staff and a possible witness in the trial, Mark Meadows, was a coward.

Trump has appealed the order, but the federal appeals court has declined to lift it. The latest decision came on Tuesday, when the full appeals court unanimously refused to reconsider Trump’s request. He’s likely to appeal that to the US supreme court. But so far, there have been few signs he can win this particular fight.

Updated at 

Cameron Joseph

The biggest question in E Jean Carroll’s defamation trial against Donald Trump isn’t whether Trump will be found liable (he already was) or even how much he’ll have to pay her (it could be a lot).

It’s how he’ll behave – and what, if anything, the judge can do to rein him in.

The last time Trump was in court, he grumbled so loudly from his seat that the judge, Lewis Kaplan, warned him he could be kicked out of court. “Mr Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited, and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive,” he said. “Mr Trump, I hope I don’t have to consider excluding you from the trial.”

“I would love it. I would love it,” Trump replied, apparently goading the judge to land on him hard so he could use it for political fodder.

It’s hard to think of how Trump could show more contempt (in the emotional, not legal, sense) for the multiple cases against him. He has repeatedly insulted and attacked prosecutors, judges and witnesses, and has clearly decided to make a spectacle of himself showing up unannounced when he isn’t required.

His claims of a “witch-hunt” have become a staple in his campaign speeches. On Tuesday, during his victory speech after winning the New Hampshire primary, he said: “Just a little note to Nikki. She’s not going to win. But if she did, she would be under investigation by those people in 15 minutes.”

Updated at 

Jury shown video of Trump confusing Carroll with ex-wife in deposition

Victoria Bekiempis

Victoria Bekiempis

Carroll’s team is now showing jurors various exhibits including a television appearance where Donald Trump repeated a denial and an excerpt of a video deposition where he’s boasting about his wealth.

Earlier this month, Trump appeared in a courtroom in the civil case brought by New York attorney general Letitia James, who has argued the former president and his business associates should pay $370m for decades of financial fraud.

Carroll’s camp played one of the most shocking deposition excerpts of Trump, in which he mistook a photo of Carroll for his ex-wife, Marla Maples. This was also played in Carroll’s first trial against the ex-president.

Here’s the video clip of Trump’s deposition where he mistook a picture of Carroll for Maples:

Donald Trump confuses E Jean Carroll with ex-wife in 2022 deposition video

Updated at 



[ad_2]

Source link

Back to top button